The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

nonZero(0) → false
nonZero(s(x)) → true
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x
id_inc(x) → x
id_inc(x) → s(x)
random(x) → rand(x, 0)
rand(x, y) → if(nonZero(x), x, y)
if(false, x, y) → y
if(true, x, y) → rand(p(x), id_inc(y))

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) CpxTrsToCpxRelTrsProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Transformed TRS to relative TRS where S is empty.

(2) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

nonZero(0) → false
nonZero(s(x)) → true
p(0) → 0
p(s(x)) → x
id_inc(x) → x
id_inc(x) → s(x)
random(x) → rand(x, 0)
rand(x, y) → if(nonZero(x), x, y)
if(false, x, y) → y
if(true, x, y) → rand(p(x), id_inc(y))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(3) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
rand(s(x15115_1), y) →⁺ rand(x15115_1, id_inc(y))
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [x15115_1 / s(x15115_1)].
The result substitution is [y / id_inc(y)].

(4) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)